Following a lovely conversation on Mihaela Varzari‘s balcony, over looking migratory bustling Brixton, where subjects subjected themselves to gentle poking and prodding, Mihaela mentioned English, tenses and rhythms.
In english, the life of stuff in time, their rhythms are very sophisticated. While a subject could have 3 beings in time, past-present-future, we can have further elaborations which take into account the repercussions, the subtle beingness in time of elements. The rhythm of time has a voice that fold, and collide with spacetime.
The phone was/is/will-be on the table.
The phone would have been/could have been on the table.
The phone is being on the table.
The table is supporting the weigh of the phone.
The phone is talking in timespace language.
In that sense, if we consider language transitions, collisions, misconnections, etc. – the links to english could rhythmical timespace based.
This is to do stuff from the language’s point of view, not a sort of cultural reading.
A line like king Ubu’s shit shit shit – or is it shitsky, shitsky, shitsky – or is it shit!! shit!! shirt!! – etc. where epistemic language reading and implementation is taking place. How Shit is in some other language and its culture, how is it known, are the kind of questions used. However, we could say that from a grammatical rhythmic perspective, we want to have something like Shitting Shitting Shitting – its a practice, not an event in time.. Or we can also pick up on the playfulness and humour for something like: been shitting,am shitting, will be shitting..
Nothing has been smelling like the scent of curried shit while the morning rises..
Or,
None smell like the scent of curry in the shit in sun rise… Isn’t the 2nd time a language that appears in english, but lives in a different timespace rhythm?