About roo discussions as a whole
We begin with a conversation between Hilan Bensusan and aharon to set initial terms and ideas about How is it to be rhythms. How rhythms are oriented, or perhaps more precisely – rhythmical orientablilities.
The idea with these discussions is to open up Rhythm Oriented Ontology for debates, play and operations we yet to imagine.
Currently
Each discussion is done in a way that creates rhythmicality of its own, questions its process, allows – via the questioning – to be up for grubs, on the frequency range between manipulable and immovable but repeatable.
Therefore the discussions include:
A recording of the voices.
A transcript of the recording that makes notes and includes some variations and after thoughts about some of the elements discussed.
A text done by a speech to text application. This program alters the terms via its own parameters and produces a chunk of text without any spaces such as: ,s .s ?s and !s etc. Hence these chunks are placed in a wiki open for people to add the spaces that operate as rhythmical legibility in languages. We hope to use it as another way to engage the operation of being Rhythms.
More means will come up as the search from Rhythm Oriented Ontology continues to evolve and?