For now, here are the recordings:
https://archive.org/details/roo02
The Speech-to-Text wiki:
An interpretative transcription of the recordings:
Recording #01
Instead of what, lets ask How is a rhythm?
Basically its a temporal contagion. A temporal infection. Transient toward what it touches. Surfaces. On the surface?
Compare to temperature.
If you have two bodies, they get affected, infected, temporal capacity to alter each others’ temperature. Like rhythms do. They alter stuff like temperature.
Contagion?
Kinds of links?
Rather than loaded with some meaning.
But it affects time. Timing. We can say more than just connected. The time is affected by others’ time/ The capacity to affect. To inflict an effect that is affective and infects the others’ time and body, and being. And..
But
And..
But.. is there no connection in this sequence?
Connection that infects inflicts itself onto a connection type?
But this is broader. The stuff is more complex. More.. I thought you were heading else where. Lets go to temperature. There is a movement. The movement is transmitted. The transmission.
Transmission wants to connect?
Is it not better than connection?
It allows connection?
Can we not have dis – miss – un – de – non – re – etc Connection?
The beat transmits. I am ready to connect. A server?
I am ready to connect. I can be connected to as an entanglement. As an affect. As an infection. As an infliction. As a causal. As an event. As a receiver. As an engagement. As a wedding. As a kiss…
But can be connection in temperature – not transmission.
Transmission.
We maybe have a connection. An affection. And a transmission.
White will affect red and vise versa.
Rhythms give you the temporal.
Red ball bounces and goes off. It goes. Its temporal. Like the tune that will bug you the whole day. It will infect your activities all through the day. Its an affection, connection transmission IN TIME. It doesn’t affect qualities of space but of Time.
If I am a beat. I am transmitting. Bip Bip Bip Bip
Like this guy
Bip bip bip
he tells stories
bip bi[ bui bip
more and more people come to listen pib bip bipbip bipbipbip bip bipbip bip
more and more people listen to his stories.
Not 10’s not 100’s
bip
bipbipbipbip bip bip vipbipbipvipbip
1000’s of people flock from all over to listen to his stories.
bip
As time goes by, slowly but surely, bipbipvipbipbip bip
less
bip
the number of people coming in to hear his stories
bip
decreases
until no one but himself hears the stories.
bip
bipbip
bipbipbipbip bip bip bip bipbip bip asked
why
biopbipbipbipbip bip bipbip bip
he continues telling stories despite no audience. He
bipbip bipbip bip bip bipbip
said:
at the beginning I told all these stories bipbip
because I wanted to change the world!
now
bip
I continue to tell them because
bipbipbip bip bipbipbip[bipbip[vip
I don’t want the world to
change
me.
Recording #2
Interesting the temporal. To do with cooking. Olives in sauce.. Different from me. Interesting. Maybe I’ll use it. Sometime.
An interesting sauce you made. A transmission. I could connect with it in time. I maybe a different time scale. Maybe in a few months.
Yes. Its, rhythms are an offer. I like that. Like something to give to present. To make present. Available to others. To exists is to co-exist.
Existence is always together.
No one god?
At least 2 elements.
Just can not.
Monothoistics will say: god is not about making existence – but where we convene. Like we might do various activities, we are all on one place. A road, a town, etc..
We talk and and and aNDand talk about..
While can c.a.n. is can because of the sequence c+a+n in that sequence. You change that sequence, can is poof not there anymore, it might be a + n + c – eg ANC of south africa.
Is there an heirarchy in can, or justa sequence different to anc where the interlinking is just, err, different..
Well.. Not sure your meanings are not very clear..
Rhythms are always ultimately up for grubs. When you move, say your arms, you always are open to be entrained or for the gravity of some other rhythmic stuff.
Like tough guy in the disco. Though guy moves not. But slowly they might get, even in their toes only. Because of the rhythms he innevitably has. In this battle between immunisation and entrainment. Under their table where no one can see – be entrained, be gravitated by the rhythms.
The sequence, the boom needs toomtoom and the timespace between.
It is a transmission. As such it is up for grabs. To be manipulated. Used. Influence. Or and and not. The being up for grabs is still up for grabness. Even, being a transmission, the up for grabs rhythm might be picked up by a certain person in an entrained way, and by another, just next to them, in a using way.
Do we sense stuff elements through meanings?
Maybe these are not meanings. If am saying X is a drama, it means not that it isn’t really dramatic, yes?
Maybe rhythm does have a drama despite the fact that am feeling it dramatic. I don’t think there is a lost paradise of sensations. I think they can be disturbed.
But yes, the sensation, the operational sensation the sequence of the drama is there. However, to say it is something else – feels transcendental. Like saying x is y while sensing that y is not x but wanting it to be y – yet knowing it isn’t y.
What makes possible to have the sensations I am having are the rhythms though. The rhythm of drama and of my thoughts, etc. The dramatic rhythm with its picks and relaxations.
Everything that exists in time has the constitution that makes time up. And making time up, to which rhythms contributes to making/creating/being-in-the-same-sequence.Making time up is rhythm.
Abstract entities might not exist in time because they are not subject for rhythms. Like numbers. But
you can not know numbers if
you dont get sequences.
If sequences
you need rhythm.
Our conception of numbers though is constituted in time.
Platonists claim that the numbers For themselves, outside of our perception, the process that transfers the numbers into our understanding, that outside of that – numbers are outside of time.
To understand anything sensible we need numbers. So to understand that which is in time we need numbers and because there is an heirarchical priority in platonist minds, numbers are out of time..
These are hard questions..
Recording #3
If..
How are numbers up for grabs?
If they are – how are they out of time?
In my sense. Numbers for Platonists are not up for grabs.. They are readymades.
We can not avoid the abstract..
Un avoidable really.
Perfection? Idealising?
Unchange-able?
Non changing?
But if so
isn’t something wrong in your perception?
What re heirarchy perception?
If you have, then it requires time – eg x more important because it Makes Y be – then you implicitly say that it is in time by being top down. It has a process..
But in platonists mind the top down effect does not touch..
Recording #4
Everything effects in one mind.
In other, for connections to take place, there might be stuff out of time..
However, up for grabs, being up for grabs is creating your own causal chain.
Not just for humans, you know..