https://archive.org/details/roo03
The Speech-to-Text wiki:
An interpretative transcription of the recordings:
recording #01
A term that seem to come back in un record ed discussion s – entanglement.
What’s meant?
No.
No?
Mixed?
No specific sense.
A salad?
Wires are entangled.
Elements are entangled yet retain individuality?
Each wire is individual?
Or
And?
Or part is meshed with one another and others retain their individuality.
Entanglement and entrainment?
Rhythms.
en en en en en en en
Rhythms when they..
Wires retain individuality..
See that entangled wire blob? Through it out of the window. yes? Suddenly its a single element.
Say we have water
tatp tap tap tap tap
and at the same time the alarm
brrrrr brrrrrrrr brrrrrrr br brrrr
these will get entangled but also entrain you.
They together will be sort of one that will entrain you in a certain way.
The entanglement will entrain – you know – when your feet move to that rhythm.
Is it the entrainment is effect rather than the entraining element itself?
In entanglement.. Are we not talking about some emergence like deLanda’s London as a single property/element/node/animal/geography/body/object/strand?
An entanglement gives allows something else to rise and emerge. In and of itself is not emergence.
Entangled rhythm is perhaps allowing an entrainment emergence.
Say Stonehenge.
The grass car park is done 4 times a year.
The rhythm of visitors.
The animals of the area, some of them will not notice the cars, for example. Or other animals, say humans, they might be entrained by the beats that have to do with the cars the cars in the car park 4 times a year.
1 2 3 4 a b c d Y I K G Y8 H00 1 2 3 4 a b c d Y I K G Y8 H00 1 2 3 4 a b c d Y I K G Y8 H00 1 2 3 4 a b c d Y I K G Y8 H00 1 2 3 4 a b c d Y I K G Y8 H00 1 2 3 4 a b c d Y I K G Y8 H00 1 2 3 4 a b c d Y I K G Y8 H00 1 2 3 4 a b c d Y I K G Y8 H00 1 2 3 4 a b c d Y I K G Y8 H00 1 2 3 4 a b c d Y I K G Y8 H00 1 2 3 4 a b c d Y I K G Y8 H00 1 2 3 4 a b c d Y I K G Y8 H00 1 2 3 4 a b c d Y I K G Y8 H00 1 2 3 4 a b c d Y I K G Y8 H00 1 2 3 4 a b c d Y I K G Y8 H00 1 2 3 4 a b c d Y I K G Y8 H00 1 2 3 4 a b c d Y I K G Y8 H00 1 2 3 4 a b c d Y I K G Y8 H00 1 2 3 4 a b c d Y I K G Y8 H00 1 2 3 4 a b c d Y I K G Y8 H00
Rhythm times space Rhythm beat boom space time.?
Entanglement is space language?
Entrainment a psychological term?
Are these in and of and from rhythms?
1 2 3 4 a b c d Y I K G Y8 H00 1 2 3 4 a b c d Y I K G Y8 H00 1 2 3 4 a b c d Y I K G Y8 H00 ——— 1 2 3 4 a b c d Y I K G Y8 H00 —
Are crossings more of rhythms? Beats of time? The sense of entanglement – psychological or
aesthetics?
Crossings trajectory
Crossings entangle
Crossing connect
Crossings link
Just different kinds..
Like transmission
toohm toohm toohm toohm toohm toohm toohm toohm toohm
—————————————————–
goohn goohn goohn goohn goohn goohn goohn goohn goohn
Why are you following me..
utrsdjgfdkghfhkgfghlfgl luhfluhtg;
follow..
Why follow?
Follow is geographical.
It suggests a necessity of being behind in a territory..
A spy?
Maybe its kind of..
You were actually just doing the same beat at the same time – not follow..
One of the reasons entrianment is interesting.
I was being trained.
You made a noise.
I decided to do the same beat.
Then on that decision I was following.
But then something changed.
The decision of following became just being with. Now this is the whole process Is entrainment. Not one of these, the whole. The whole process I jest described.
No. I don’t think its psychological.
Like stones entrained by the tides of the sea. Are we saying there is a psychology there?
I’d say though it might be our psyche being projected upon the process to do with the stones.
I fail to see the link.
There is a type of stuff – link. And within that there are variuos kinds.. Maybe entrainment is a part of these kinds. One of these kinds. On a range between Links and connections and entrainment, perhaps.
Look.. Maybe you are too careful.
When you see the sunrise from the earth, you make a rhythm. Its imbricated. Implicated. Yes rhythms are also psychological.
Rhythms get into us.. Via senses.
recording #02
Senses..
Senses as aesthetics.. Stuff to sense. Crudely –
Anaesthetics – aesthetics to sense falling asleep. Aesthetics are the stuff we are not falling asleep from..
Rhythms are in and of themselves, seem to be, sensual, of the senses.. However I also think they are fertile to Be more conceptual, adaptable to other stuff, with other stuff.
Like a sequence of a 1 wood.
a = a fall. any fall is a. No A is any Drop. of a wave, a tone, from a height, etc.
1 = a single. A single person. Not a couple. a singular. Anything in between.. In that range.
Wood = the tree, the Macbeth Wood, the floor.
Now we have a language – not a code. range made of 1 a and wood.
Much more adaptable, than just boom boom bam.
A A A AA WOOD A AA A AA A WOOD 1 A.
Now we have a sort of being because it has a range, an adaptability, made of rhythms of a rhythm making time.
Like you know..
Numbers are not just natural ones.. imaginary etc..
Yes.. rhythms permeate.. they propagate.. They have no borders.. Like the temperature at the check point in Jerusalem – its hot both sides..
The conceptual..
Rhythm of the senses.
The conceptual is sensual.
There are reasons..
Conceptual affected by rhythms..
Not sure.. Conceptual.. Concepts in themselves and of and from themselves have rhythms no?
Like you say, you work with ranges of concepts.. Thats rhythms. Material.. You are a re rhythm maker with philosophy.
Maybe it could be interesting to write from a rhythmic point of view..
Maybe maybe maybe trajectory, maybe reparations, time times time 1 then range the range booking, book, range book, range ranges ranging sequence, trajectory trajectory.
Or booking we book a flight, the book on the floor, shall we call? booking is predetermined, book as a mantra. Book a mantra. Call, call. calling out. Call on the phone. Call a name. Call an object. Object a mantra, Mantra of culture. Media echo book. The echo as mantra. echo chamber as mantra in a booking of prime ministers. There is a certain repetition that entrains. Mantra. Mantra comes back. Truth and mantra. Truth made by mantra? By rhythms? Truth as a rhythm? Mantra of truth? Mantra of range? Range of repetition? Zeitgeist mantra. Stuff being repeated into the ghost of our time. A truth of a sense. Uncomfortable and truth. A truth. In no mantra, No repetition. But yet the truth holds its sensual significance.
No Mantra.
Yes. Its a technology.
The technology of performativity. We perform. We show a performance. A performance of Beuyes as a lecture? Beuyes? You repeat in your head. Beuys what can i say? That is a kind of mantra.
What is between commencement and mantra?
Oh
Ohhhhhh
Oh
OH
ohhhhhh
ohh.
Humm.. Anthropocene.. We are slowly going into stuff to do the changing the the earth itself geologically that we do. Geological structures we move. Not the earth itself. The stakes a rhythmical. The geology not only entrains your like, breath, etc. Now suddenly we entrain the geo. We have a jam session with the physicality of movements of the planet.
What we beginning to se is a link and close connection between us and the geology of the planet.
Very close rhythmical connection that is being raised with anthropocene scene. The range of anthropocene. In Blackpool fracking. Stuff propagates. We used to think of biology, eco rhythms, now we can talk of geo..
Humm
Fracking is more invasive that drilling.
Some say anthropocene has began with drilling etc. – but yes.. the range the frequencies are slow.. Are all 200-300 year ago stuff begins to move in these beats of intervention with geology. The anthropocene.
————————————–
NOTES
I spy X and X spies me or do they?
We can spy each other only if we are in the same range.