One can parody, imitate and ape generation. One can Be generational in a way of another, eg a Turing test of being. However, unless the being a bot, or a dna, or a brass, or a wind, or a poem – in terms of rhythms is both individually unique and of various species-able ranges,
Perhaps the degeneration process – like a crack/glitch in being – can not do that which generation does. It is both an element in the operation that affords and allows generational process and yet, at the same beat, just with a different sequence/twist, it is an element in a operation that can not ape but itself. Each being degenerates UN-escapably in its own rhythmic beats of an affording and in-escapable reality. In that sense, to put it crudely, death is the truth life can spring its up-for-grabness from..
Is that the lighter beat of dark humour..? 😉
Or
In that SensE, the propagational material, the aesthetic operations of inheritress and transmission, are these of degeneration spectrum capacity ranges. These can allow generational operations to be. These can allow a generation of memories of being under up-front Thatcherite rule, or witnessing the birth life and death of the Concorde – however, the degeneration of these memories, from propagation through to
sharing/voicing opinions about them – is intertwined with the degeneration of the degerational operation’s inescapable elements, its innate immanence rhythms. Sure these are affected by the time generation the entity is at, however, this is a different process to the one am interested to focus here. Not a secondary, but has its own various links and affordances.. It so seems now, anyway..
Can there be an aesthetics of imansense..? (not immanence..)